I reported you and we both got warnings so I'm stopping now.
Well good thing I never explicitly said I was "smart" and I hope you aren't saying that I am not smart because I use the "tis" - which answers your question on who uses that word, I do. That would be weak reason as to why I'm not "smart".
Shut up, you sound stupid. I don't know why you are even continuing. You aren't smart, at all. Who still uses the word "tis"? Just, again, leave me alone.
I haven't been trying to prove why I needed to degrade your opinion in these past few replies of mine, though my answer could be found in the general questions I asked you. You should give those questions some thought. By "act smart" I'm referring how you tried to say I misspelled "between" wrong when I wasn't trying to spell "between" and I instead used the word "betwixt". Then right after you call me an impertinent swine. However since you were wrong about "betwixt", your brashness and attempt at insult as a follow-up made you an imbecile. Or do you mean that you never try to be smart in general? Whoooooooo knows knows knows knows knows knows???
Ok, you got me their, I really don't care. Again, you have failed to- and what do you mean try to act smart? ANYWAYS, you have yet again failed to prove why you needed to degrade my OPINION!!! Soo... leave me alone.
I wasn't asking specifically why you shared your opinion; at the of end of the first set of questions I said, "these questions should be taken in a general sense not specific to you or I". So debates on any subject should never take place? I don't use spell check; presumption can make a person look like a fool. Jokes on you - not really since there isn't a joke - "betwixt" is an actual word (it is a synonym to "between"). Gasp! Then after being incorrect about "betwixt" you try to insult me but because of your error in trying to be "smart" it makes you look more the idiot. Since a few posts ago I've been trying to have a civil conversation with you, however you have been resistant to any such conversation happening whilst being unnecessarily rude.
Okay, the reason I shared my opinion is because the question was asking it of us. That's it. Why debate? an opinion is an opinion. subjecting one opinion with another is redundant and pointless. Okay? Prove to me I'm wrong. That's it. You haven't yet and you won't. Heartless angel didn't continue this stupid nonsense, then why should you? And with the English, go **** yourself. Stop using spell checker to see if you spelled things right. Oh wait, you didn't because you spelled between us wrong you impertinent swine. Oh, and I didn't report you because it wouldn't have any point or feeling of success. Get my point? Stop, just stop.
I'm 22... Interesting point. Pointless argument. Why dissent with an opinion? Tis just an opinion is it not? But then why even give an opinion? Who really cares? What makes the opinion of a regular person, like you or I, important to be heard? On the other side, should there never be debate? A debate has opposing arguments or in a more relative term - opinions. Are only certain subjects worthy of debate? What subjects are worthy? Should opinions never be questioned? Should there not be any sort of responsibility or accountability with an opinion? These questions should be taken in a general sense not specific to you or I. Are you psychic? Somehow you "know" my mother. If you are psychic why didn't you telepathically tell me what you really meant in that post? Can you tell me my gf's middle name? I find it important to care about using good English skills anywhere, otherwise problems can arise, such as the incident that occurred betwixt us. There are circumstances, such as when joking, that may require using poor English. If you use English in the real world you may care but why the double-standard? Why not continue to use good English online? I'll reiterate myself, when arguing tis never really good to call a person a derogatory term or a "name"; the latter can be done with sufficient "evidence". At the same time, littering what you say with swear words is not good either. But if you want to keep on doing what you do, go ahead, and let whatever image of you be. A good example(s) would be my replies to you, which don't contain swear words or enraged tones; controlling emotions is another plus. I have an inquiry: why couldn't you report me?
Too bad I can't report you.
Okay, shut the **** up. What point did you give to give your opinion on mine? None. So there, you fail yet again. *report* Are you 8? Cause all you are doing is continuing a pointless argument. Heartless stopped and you should too. WHAT SATISFACTION ARE YOU GOING TO GET FROM THIS!? NONE!!!!! Even if you prove a non-existent point, what then? Your pathetic mother doesn't tell you that she loves you enough? No? Because you are a failure at life. who cares about English comprehension on a ****ing forum. There is no English teacher so I* don't give a ****. Damn you you arrogant ****.
If you actually had cared to read what I said you would know that I wasn't talking about if their weapons suck, but that you improperly conveying your thoughts on their weapons was your fault not mine. Nowhere in that last VM did I argue that your opinion was wrong on their celestial weapons. I was arguing that it was all your fault for writing that sentence about the celestial weapons that caused this "misunderstanding" because a certain somebody did not write what they actually meant. Lemme tell ya it is a pain when somebody does that and then if they try to pass it off as not their fault - really trifling. See there's no need to swear every single time you reply - it's just bad form. Plus calling people names isn't a winning formula in an argument. And if opinions were never commented on then life would be a boring place. If you don't like having to defend your opinion once in a while then don't let it be known. I didn't say that I was a toddler I said, "if I am a "kid" then are you a toddler? Great job at reading comprehension. Bwahahahaha.
O...M...G You are still going? It was an opinion. Even if I did say their weapon sucks as in the weapons themselves, that is not for you to reply on or disagree on. You had no reason to comment on a opinion @$$ You're are right, you aren't a toddler, you are a newborn cactuar... all I hear is Ge-ka Ge-ka...
Yeah, that was all you. The difference between saying their weapons generally suck and that the process of getting sucks is 1 word. 1 word. 1. Here is what you said: "And, kimahris celestrial weapon sux, same with lulu". With one word - 1 word - I will change the meaning of your sentence to mean the process: "And, getting kimarhi's celestial weapon sux, same with lulu." You were that "tired" to not include 1 word and expect me to understand what you said. It wasn't a case of an incomplete sentence. What you wrote was a complete sentence that properly would tell the reader the idea you were trying to convey. Accountability. I didn't forget to write 1 word, you did. And if I'm a kid does that make you a toddler? Because you're the one raging and all.
You misunderstood, I was telling him why it wasn't my fault. He didn't say anything about that in his last reply. That's where the post you showed me comes in. And jesus F****** christ kid, get off my balls and stop this stupid stuff, I'm relaly about to report you. Yea I know, stupid threat, but you are irritating me.
Avoidance - action of the day. I keep showing you what you said however, you are having a hard time remembering. I didn't recall from memory that part of your post, I copy & pasted. Your words right there. A)This is a part of your post: "Sorry if I come off as an asshole here, but that was really entirely your fault, don't try to pass the blame to others." Okay, that reply from Zargabaath was his one fault, reason why you didn't disdain my approach to him in my last post. B)This is part of your post that is quoted from Heartless Angel (i.e., Heartless Angel wrote this): "Sorry if I come off as an asshole here, but that was really entirely your fault, don't try to pass the blame to others." C)This is what you had directly under that quote from Heartless Angel: Okay, that reply from Zargabaath was his one fault, reason why you didn't disdain my approach to him in my last post. What you wrote makes it look like I, Zargabaath, said, "Sorry if I come off as an asshole here, but that was really entirely your fault, don't try to pass the blame to others." Why does it look this way? Because right under what was quoted [from part B] you wrote, "Okay, that reply from Zargabaath was his (which would mean me, Zargabaath) one fault, reason why you (Heartless Angel) didn't disdain my (you, o0Odin0o) approach to him (Me, Zargabaath) in my (you, o0Odin0o) last post. And I've asked what reply? If you are talking about my replies to you in the thread, which I've only replied twice I could understand what you actually wrote, but why would Heartless Angel's quote be needed? I didn't write that, he did. At the same time, why would my name be mentioned and I be made to look as if wrote that quote that was actually written by Heartless Angel. The word of the day is - Accountability.
